Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Devin Coleman v. Michael Stanford, et al
as 22-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN L. COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MICHAEL Q. STANFORD and OFFICER KRISTENE M. BRADY-DOWNES
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 22-4007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALAND BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, PETE AGUILAR, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, COLIN Z. ALLRED, in their capacity as United States House Representatives and others
White-Manning v. Brewer et al
as 1:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn White-Manning
Defendant:
MD Jeffrey J Brewer, UBMD Physician's Group, MD Andrew Nordin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Johnson v. Dalton, et al
as 21-1339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE DALTON, RICHARD HODGE, JANET SMITH and others
Brady v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Brady and Lisa Marie Brady
Defendant:
Mark E. Howard, Gary E. Hicks, James P. Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 8:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
Mark Mace, Kayla M Brady, Debra McCreary and others
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brady v. Davita, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00910
Defendant:
Davita, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LISA M BRADY and Lisa M. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Winegardner et al
as 4:2020cv01501
Plaintiff:
James E. King, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Jones, Timothy M. Brady, Kurtis R. Winegardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
