Cases 11 - 20 of 192
Cook et al v. Watson et al
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Joel Thomas Alexander Cook, Jerald Clayton Daniels, Pierreron Tony Rodolph and others
Defendant:
Captain Eric Watson, Admin Sergeant Betty Furlough, Jim Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hamilton, Richard v. Prime Communications, L.P. et al
as 3:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Hamilton
Defendant:
Prime Communications, L.P. and Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Defendant:
Latoyia Carpenter, Wesley Leatham, J Douglas Overbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Monro et al
as 9:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Barton
Defendant:
Yvonne Monro, Carol M. Hamilton, April Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pacheco-Morales v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Respondent:
Aaron Tompkins, G Gilder and M Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Hamilton
as 21-11157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ruel M. Hamilton
Hatch v. Preckwinkle et al
as 1:2020cv04341
Defendant:
Illinois Secretary of State Department of Administrative Hearings, Cook County, Illinois Secretary of State, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Hatch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pacheco-Morales v. Tompkins et al
as 4:2021cv03051
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Aaron Tompkins, G Gilder and M Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
