Cases 11 - 20 of 1,706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
DAVIS v. ANGULO et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Plaintiff:
RUSKIN DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ANGULO, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C GILMAN and others
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren MacDonald v. Ybarra Professional Builders
as 5:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
Ybarra Professional Builders
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
