Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIXON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv13443
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MARY DIXON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Leann Marie Dixon v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv01913
Plaintiff:
Leann Marie Dixon
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DIXON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv11028
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MARY DIXON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Oliphant v. Villano
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv02014
Plaintiff:
Robin Marie Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Zachary Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 17-60447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, MARY DIXON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
