Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Fleming v. USA
as 0:2020cv01607
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elbassiony v. New York City et al
as 1:2019cv02128
Defendant:
Matthew Slavin, PO Michael Pascale, PO Nicholas Mosby and others
Plaintiff:
Nourhan Elbassiony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07439
Defendant:
Jennifer Burmistrz, James D. Cascone, Michael Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Legend Booth, E'Monie Booth, Ebony Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prudential Insurance Company of America et al v. Fleming et al
as 2:2017cv01487
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Pruco Securities LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Michael Fleming and Patrick Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleming v. Dunaski et al
as 0:2017cv04725
Defendant:
Mike Dunaski , City of St. Paul, the and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. Fleming
as 2:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JT3, L.L.C. v. Aguirre et al
as 2:2017cv01471
Defendant:
Alexander James Aguirre, Annette Aguirre, Gemma Aguirre and others
Plaintiff:
JT3, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pare et al v. Britton et al
as 4:2015cv03055
Plaintiff:
Eric Berning, Kurt Brown, Kenneth Capps and others
Interested Party:
Orlando Brewer, Orlando Brewer, Anthony Hancock and others
Defendant:
Fred Britton, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obst et al v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv03054
Interested Party:
Orlando Brewer, Ricky Fletcher and Anthony Hancock
Defendant:
Fred Britton, Scott Frakes and Nebraska Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Kurt Brown, Kenneth Capps, Michael Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
