Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21641
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TYLER THOMPSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pal v. Cipolla
as 20-4222
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Smaldone, Robert Cipolla and Michael Tyler
Defendant:
Town of Wilton, Richard Janes, Daniel Monahan and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Neelu Pal
Tyler v. Lumpkin
as 20-20555
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Tyler
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
TYLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99737
Plaintiff:
DEVIN MICHAEL TYLER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackwell v. Palmer et al
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
MARK ALAN THIGPEN, Cherokee County, Ohio Casualty Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
JASON BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nikovic v. 83-84 116th Owners Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv06134
Defendant:
A. Michael Tyler Realty Corp. and 83-84 116th Owners Corp.
Plaintiff:
Avdi Nikovic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCormick v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyler McCormick
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
McKinney et al v. Environmental Reclamation Solutions, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyler Asch and Christina Marie Murphy McKinney
Defendant:
Vallie Ray Zettler and Environmental Reclamation Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dooley v. Assemblers, Inc. (RLJ2)
as 1:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyler Dooley
Defendant:
Assemblers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
