Cases 11 - 20 of 452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Virtue Recovery Center et al
as 6:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Virtue Recovery Center, Ms. FNU Jaquez, Dr. Rajesh Harripersad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00509
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv09715
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Centennial Bank v. Holmes, et al
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Jerry "Bud" Holmes, Jay House, Channing Baisley and others
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brauning v. Christian, et al
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GILBERT CHRISTIAN, individual and Sheriff of Pontotoc County, CHARLES STEVEN KESSINGER, individual and District Judge of Pontotoc County, LORI LYNN JACKSON, individual and Associate District Judge and others
Scripps v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv12236
Plaintiff:
Michael Scripps
Defendant:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
