Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14872
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nails v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mike West, James M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntosh v. Local 33, United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers et al
as 1:2012cv11815
Plaintiff:
Daniel McIntosh
Defendant:
Local 33, United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers , Paul Bickford , Brian Brusseau and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
McIntosh v. Local 33 United Roofers, Water, et al
as 12-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL 33 UNITED ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS, PAUL BICKFORD, Buisiness Manager for Local 33 United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Union, BRIAN BRUSSO, President of Local 33 United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Union and others
McIntosh v. Local 33 United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers et al
as 1:2011cv11182
Defendant:
Local 33 United Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Paul Bickford, Brian Brusso and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Angela Nails v. Mike Foley
as 10-15782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE FOLEY
Nails v. Foley
as 2:2010cv00409
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Mike Foley and Mike Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Foley
as 2:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Mike Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leggett v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Darryl Leggett
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Mike Foley and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
