Cases 11 - 20 of 47
USA v. Salvatore Pelullo
as 19-1398
Defendant / Appellant:
SALVATORE PELULLO, a/k/a COUSIN, a/k/a SAL, a/k/a THE CONSULTANT, a/k/a MR. TURNER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mr. Boyd, Mary Collins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. DOE et al
as 3:2018cv00251
Defendant:
MRS. TURNER, JOHN DOE, DABBS and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Bradley et al
as 4:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Mr. Turner, Warden Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gilmore v. Blanketship, et al
as 3:2018cv01489
Defendant:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, Investigator Shuler, Mr. Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Blanketship, et al
as 1:2017cv00729
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Defendant:
Blanketship, Mr. Turner, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Clarke et al
as 2:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Karim A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Zook, Natarcha Gregg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Salvatore Pelullo
as 15-2826
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALVATORE PELULLO, a/k/a COUSIN, a/k/a SAL, a/k/a THE CONSULTANT, a/k/a MR. TURNER
Raymond Ford, Jr. v. Jerry Mile
as 15-6627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY A. MILES, DDS, DR. HAYES, Dentist, C. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MR. TURNER, LPN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
