Cases 11 - 20 of 12,773
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent:
Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Goldstein v. ONSite Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv11295
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant:
ONSite Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Rosales v. Nathan
as 4:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Paul H. Nathan, Jr.
Counter Claimant:
Paul H Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LeaseLeads Inc. v. Cardinal Group Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
LeaseLeads Inc.
Defendant:
Cardinal Group Holdings LLC, Agency Fifty3 LLC, RevGen Partners, Inc. and others
LATSHAW et al v. BOSCOV'S et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
VICKIE LATSHAW and NATHAN LATSHAW
Defendant:
BOSCOV'S agent of t/d/b/a Boscov's and Boxcov's 67 and BOSCOV'S DEPARTMENT STORE, LLC agent of t/d/b/a Boxcov's and Boscov's 67
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Berry v. Sinatra et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Berry
Defendant:
Cole Sinatra, Maria Cabrera, Sea Schiebelhut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wood v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bryant Wood
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
