Cases 11 - 20 of 455
ODEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33449
Plaintiff:
REGINALD ODEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Oden et al
as 2:2023cv05626
Plaintiff:
Monique B Holmes
Defendant:
Wilbur Lee Oden, Jr, J&M Tank Lines, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Newton v. Oden
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Sye Christopher Ras Newton
Defendant:
Georgette P. Oden doing business as G. Oden PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oden v. Lewis
as 6:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Russell Oden
Defendant:
Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv06114
Plaintiff:
LaTresa Oden
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10112
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ODEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
M2B Funding Corp. et al v. Douglas B. Croxall et al
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
M2B Funding Corp. and Oden Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Douglas B. Croxall and Natasha Allas Croxall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ODEN v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
MYRON ODEN
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Oden v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
John David Oden
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
