Cases 11 - 20 of 113
CHUKWU v. MUSK et al
as 1:2022cv06211
Plaintiff:
OBIOMA CHUKWU
Defendant:
ELON MUSK and OPRAH WINFREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Winfrey
as 2:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Winfrey et al
as 3:2019cv00277
Plaintiff:
Freda J. Day
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey, Lionsgate Entertainment Corporation, Own: Oprah Winfrey Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Eggsware v. Winfrey et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eggsware
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey, Google and You tube LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Crosby et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Crosby
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Lebron James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Freda Day v. Oprah Winfrey
as 21-1627
Defendant / Appellee:
OPRAH WINFREY, an individual, HARPO PRODUCTIONS, an Illinois Corp., OWN: OPRAH WINFREY NETWORK, LLC, a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDA J. DAY
Harris v. Sony Entertainment
as 20-3774
Defendant / Appellee:
Jermaine Dupri, Mariah Carey, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latoya J. Harris
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv01025
Defendant:
Keisha Bird, Steve Harvey, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell R. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
