Cases 11 - 20 of 24
HAMILTON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04734
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL HAMILTON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and CHASE BANK USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Solomon Ogbemudia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72397
Petitioner:
SOLOMON OGBEMUDIA, AKA Paul Hamilton, AKA Ipaluyi
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Ogbemudia v. Sessions
as 17-261
Petitioner:
Solomon Ogbemudia, AKA Paul Hamilton, AKA Ipaluyi
Respondent:
Sally Q. Yates, Acting United States Attorney General and Jeff Sessions, Acting United States Attorney General
Solomon Ogbemudia v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60513
Petitioner:
SOLOMON OGBEMUDIA, also known as Paul Hamilton, also known as Ipaluyi
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morgan v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2015cv00079
Defendant:
Lori Melanie Fuson, Dee Hamilton, Paul Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ara Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Story et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11929
Plaintiff:
Marsha Story and Paul Hamilton Story
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 9:2012cv03111
Plaintiff:
Paul Hamilton, Jr and Louise Hamilton
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , Argent Mortgage Company LLC , Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Hamilton v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv03745
Plaintiff:
Roland Paul Hamilton
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Hamilton v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv03743
Petitioner:
Roland Paul Hamilton
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01045
Defendant:
O'Brien's Response Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Prejean , Darren Benson , Thomas Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
