Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Pulice v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society et al
as 2:2019cv01214
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
Plaintiff:
Tina Pulice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pulice v. Crown Cork & Seal USA et al
as 5:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal USA
Plaintiff:
Paul Pulice
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lankford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Joseph Taylor, Benjamin Griego, Jodi Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility v. New Grace Rehabilitation Center, PLLC et al
as 2:2017cv11007
Defendant:
New Grace Rehabilitation Center, PLLC , Prodigy Spinal Rehabilitation, PLC , Summer Rose Fakhouri and others
Plaintiff:
Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Boudreaux et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Carmen Boudreaux and Ronald Pulice
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earle v. Shreves et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Vernon Norman Earle
Defendant:
Shreves, J. Rivera, R. Domas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sue v. Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell
as 1:2016mc00358
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sue
Defendant:
Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, Rush Moore, LLP, Stewart Law Offices and others
Cheryl Sue of the House of Marshall etc. v. Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell
as 1:2016mc00361
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sue
Defendant:
Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, Rush Moore, LLP, Stewart Law Offices and others
Cheryl Sue of the House of Marshall etc. v. Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell
as 1:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sue
Defendant:
Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, Rush Moore, LLP, Stewart Law Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
