Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Walton v. Meadows
as 2:2016cv11792
Plaintiff:
Kendale Walton
Defendant:
David R Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MEADOWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02074
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
SEPTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, EDWARD KAISER and TROY PARHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamal Bennett v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 13-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN GREENSBURG SCI, W. MATTHEWS, Unit Manager at SCI Greensburg and others
BENNETT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
JAMAL BENNETT
Defendant:
J. WETZEL, J. MAZURKIEWICZ, W. MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADOWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Homer Wood v. Dr. Micklo
as 12-6980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOMER AVERY WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD V. MICKLOS, LINDA PADGETT, RN, R. MEADOW and others
Defendant:
BETH CHADWICK and JOHN B. SMITH
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Polyguard Products Inc v. W R Meadows Inc
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Polyguard Products Inc
Defendant:
W R Meadows Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MEADOWS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80775
Plaintiff:
CALVIN R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEADOWS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80783
Plaintiff:
CALVIN R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
