Cases 11 - 20 of 977
Terry Reed v. Denny Strickland, III, et al
as 24-10435
Plaintiff:
TERRY M. REED
Defendant:
DENNY L. STRICKLAND, III, as father and next friend of minor child, Deceased, individual and official capacity, JOHN PAUL BOSWELL, individual and official capacity, WESLEY LAVON PEARSON, JR., individual and official capacity and others
Patrick McIntosh v. Eric Williams, Warden
as 24-1237
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams, Warden
Patrick McIntosh v. Unknown Charleston County Sheriff's Deputies, et al
as 24-10408
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RANDALL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, UNKNOWN CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE OFFICERS ET.AL, SHERRI A. BROWN and others
Gormidou Lavela v. Randell Peterson
as 24-1118
Plaintiff:
GORMIDOU Y. LAVELA
Defendant:
RANDELL D. PETERSON
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce Lazo v. Cyan Building Maintenance Services, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jeimy P. Ponce Lazo
Defendant:
Cyan Building Maintenance Services, LLC and Randell Ramat
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patrick McIntosh v. Jared Rardin
as 24-1017
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
US v. Randell Proctor
as 23-4764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDELL LEE PROCTOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
