Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Geronimo Jr. v. Rocha et al
as 1:2021cv23510
Plaintiff:
Elkton Longjaw Geronimo Jr.
Defendant:
Fernando Aenlle Rocha and Richard Earl Getchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George v. Cisneros
as 3:2021cv01674
Petitioner:
Richard Earl George
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Salazar et al v. Rafaela T. King et al
as 2:2021cv06030
Plaintiff:
Daniel Salazar, Michael Shaw, Daniel Gomez and others
Defendant:
Rafaela T King, City of Compton, DOES 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pouliot v. Superintendant "John Doe" et al
as 2:2021cv00396
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Pouliot
Defendant:
Superintendant "John Doe", Wellpath, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Baroni
as 4:2021cv00499
Defendant:
Kevin M. Baroni
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin III v. Unimark Truck Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00347
Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, Alejandro Andrade, Unimark Truck Transport, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest R Baldwin III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC)George v. Cisneros, et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl George
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Futch et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Jackson County Circuit Court, David Futch and Wendy Neviels
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EARL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00731
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin III v. Unimark Truck Transport, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00184
Defendant:
AUTO TRUCK TRANSPORT USA, LLC, Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, Alejandro Andrade and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest R Baldwin III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
