Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Hacker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00987
Plaintiff:
Eugene Barrett, Robert Robertson, James Norman and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11422
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson, Catalino Robles, John Harty and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Little Robertson v. Orange County Board of Comm., et al
as 18-11699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LITTLE ROBERT ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER OFFICE, Official capacity and DULANEY, Correctional officer, individual capacity
Robertson v. Orange County Board of Commissioner Office et al
as 6:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Little Robert Robertson
Defendant:
Orange County Board of Commissioner Office and Officer Dulaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. BREC et al
as 3:2018cv00075
Defendant:
BREC and Dan M. Scheuermann
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilson et al v. Stroman et al
as 1:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
John Arnold, Ronald Atterbury, Mitchell Bradford and others
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, City of Waco, Texas, Christopher Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Robertson v. Pittman et al
as 1:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson
Defendant:
William Pittman, Eric Briscoe, Richard Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
