Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Bradley Foster v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1990
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Jane Doe, whose true names are unknown and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bradley Wayne Foster
Randy Hammermeister v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1970
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Katherine McDowell and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randy Earl Hammermeister
Peter Lonergan v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1964
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Kent Johansen and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Gerard Lonergan
Kenneth Hand v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1962
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul J. Halverson, David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Donald Hand
Allan v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, David Herman, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01531
Plaintiff:
Bob Ross Peterson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Henderson v. Peterson et al
as 1:2013cv12179
Plaintiff:
Carol Henderson
Defendant:
Ross Peterson and Caryn Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Freeze, et al v. City of Decherd, Tennessee, et al
as 12-6160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY L. FREEZE, DORIS FREEZE and EARNEST D. COLVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DECHERD, TENNESSEE, BETTY DON HENSHAW, SCOTT MOORE and others
Freeze et al v. City of Decherd, Tennessee et al
as 4:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Freeze, Doris Freeze and Earnest D. Colvin
Defendant:
City of Decherd, Tennessee, Betty Don Henshaw, Scott Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
