Cases 11 - 20 of 100
ABC IP, LLC et al v. Burse
as 1:2026cv01118
Plaintiff:
ABC IP, LLC, Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. and RBTM LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Rusty Burse d/b/a Shackleford's FRT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Ebady
as 26-1418
Defendant:
DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF, BRYCEN MILLETT and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ebady (Tsikman)
as 26-1368
Defendant:
DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF, HERSHEL TSIKMAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zuniga-Garcia v. Drake
as 6:2026cv00220
Plaintiff:
Justin Zuniga-Garcia
Defendant:
Rusty Drake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 6:2026cv01910
Petitioner:
Rusty A. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnston v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv00184
Petitioner:
Rusty Todd Johnston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bradley Hester v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-11460
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY HESTER
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, SHERIFF MATTHEW GENTRY, Sheriff of Cullman County, Alabama, in official and individual capacity, MARTHA WILLIAMS and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
NOEL v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2026cv00100
Plaintiff:
JAMEY J. NOEL
Defendant:
SCOTT A. MAPLES, JR., MARK A. GRUBE, JR., JEFFREY HEARON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
