Cases 11 - 20 of 2,733
Wilson et al v. Millcreek Commercial Properties LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Roger Wilson, Sandra Freeze, Owena Bomben and others
Defendant:
Millrock Investment Fund 1 LLC, Brent Smith, Kevin G Long and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rutherford v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv00527
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Luncsford v. Watkins et al
as 1:2024cv01290
Defendant:
Brian Johnson, Jewel Sanders, Sgt Cristian Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C Luncsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv01005
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Travis Lampley, Scott Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dutton v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01006
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Syler Warley and Zachary Williams
Plaintiff:
David Dutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06928
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hendrixson v. Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Scott Hendrixson
Defendant:
Bradley Harwell, Rutherford County, Tennessee, Eric Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KHAYRALLAH v. RUTHERFORD
as 4:2024cv00257
Defendant:
JOHN H RUTHERFORD
Plaintiff:
KOJO KARUME AL-ZUBAIR KHAYRALLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Mawule Tepe
as 24-10722
Respondent:
Rebecca Rutherford, Internal Revenue Service, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Petitioner:
In re: Mawule Tepe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
