Cases 11 - 20 of 36
US v. Wallace Lester
as 14-7285
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALLACE T. LESTER
John Beaman v. Deputy Director
as 12-7136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. BEAMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Community Corrections, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, LOU CEI, Special Programs Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. v. Lester
as 5:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
Donita T. Lester and Michael S. Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Powers v. Clarke et al
as 3:2011cv00763
Plaintiff:
James Powers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke and Layton T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Smith v. TX Dept of Criminal Justice, et al
as 11-50470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD DESHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Correctional Institution, T LESTER, Warden, TURNER, Sergeant and others
Farrell v. Lester
as 3:2011cv00267
Petitioner:
Joseph D. Farrell
Defendant:
L. T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farrell v. Lester
as 7:2011cv00193
Petitioner:
Joseph D. Farrell
Defendant:
L. T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2011cv00128
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Knighten, T. Lester and others
Plaintiff:
Edward DeShan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McGath et al v. Hamilton Local School District et al
as 2:2010cv01156
Plaintiff:
Joshua McGath , Timothy McGath and Michelle McGath
Defendant:
Hamilton Local School District, Christopher T Lester and Board of Education, Hamilton Local School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
