Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Derek Montez v. Cody Hampton, et al
as 13-20331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK WAYNE MONTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CODY HAMPTON, CLARA ANDERSON, BRUCE BAGGETT and others
Pierce et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pierce and Ruth Pierce
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-02002
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pierce and Ruth Pierce
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Pierce v. American Home Mortgage Servicing et al
as 1:2013cv00550
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pierce
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SMITH et al v. LONG BEACH ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06712
Plaintiff:
CAROL SMITH and GERALD SMITH
Defendant:
LONG BEACH ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER, INC., ST. FRANCIS PARISH, ST. FRANCIS CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Montez v. Hampton et al
as 4:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
Derek Wayne Montez
Defendant:
Cody Hampton, Clara Anderson, Bruce Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Wall et al
as 1:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stone
Defendant:
A. T. Wall, James Weeden, Donna Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
