Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Roosevelt Smith, Elizabeth Buckley, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denoyer v. United States of America et al
as 8:2015cv00185
Petitioner:
Dale Ernest DeNoyer
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal's Service, U.S. Parole Commission, U.S. Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denoyer v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv04088
Petitioner:
Dale Ernest DeNoyer
Respondent:
United States of America, U.S. Marshal's Service, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, CJA-Attorney and U.S. Marshal's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentine v. Bodkin et al
as 3:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Valentine
Defendant:
Edward Bodkin, Adam J. Wratchford, Michael W. Zervos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00481
Defendant:
JENNIFER COFFMAN, FBI OFFICE, SECRET SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
STACY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chapman v. Douglas County Official's et al
as 8:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Douglas Co. Public Defender, Douglas County Official's and U.S. Marshall's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06289
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
