Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Vanderhoff et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
as 6:2019cv03390
Plaintiff:
Leonard Vanderhoff and Ivalee Vanderhoff
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanderhoff v. City Of Nanticoke et al
as 3:2018cv01071
Plaintiff:
Amos Vanderhoff
Defendant:
City Of Nanticoke and Police Chief Thomas Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderhoff-Colon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00707
Plaintiff:
Georgia Vanderhoff-Colon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rendon v. Vanderhoff et al
as 1:2016cv02170
Plaintiff:
Sergio Rendon
Defendant:
Scott Vanderhoff and YRC Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
VanderHoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Alisa VanderHoff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Vanderhoff et al v. Cascade Bancorp et al
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael L Vanderhoff and Katheryne A. Gaskell
Defendant:
Cascade Bancorp , Home Federal Bancorp, Inc., Home Federal Savings & Loan Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emlich et al v. OhioHealth Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01697
Plaintiff:
William F. Emlich, Jr. and Associates in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inc.
Defendant:
OhioHealth Corporation, Doctors Hospital, Doctors Health Corporation of Nelsonville and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Southern California Institute v. The State of Bar of California, et al
as 14-55690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, JAMES H. AGUIRRE, individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
