Cases 11 - 20 of 46
William Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50827
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK GIBSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gibson v. Miller et al
as 2:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
William Marshall Gibson
Defendant:
Dave Miller and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roberts and Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Wethington, James Wethington, Robert S. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Gibson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25818
Plaintiff:
Lori Gibson and William Lee Gibson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Lon Steven Walker
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Putnam County Government, William Edward Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NLM Capital Partners, L.P., v. Mobicom Corporation et al
as 5:2013mc80022
Plaintiff:
NLM Capital Partners, L.P.,
Defendant:
William E. Gibson and Mobicom Corporation
Walker v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013mc00002
Plaintiff:
Lon Steven Walker
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Putnam County Government, William Edward Gibson and others
Gibson v. Express Brake International et al
as 0:2012cv03068
Plaintiff:
William J. Gibson, Jr.
Defendant:
Express Brake International, Prairie Trailer Sales & Service and Allstate Peterbilt of Alexandria
NLM Capital Partners, L.P. v. Mobicom Corporation et al
as 1:2010mc00275
Plaintiff:
NLM Capital Partners, L.P.
Defendant:
William E. Gibson and Mobicom Corporation
USA v. William Gibson
as 12-12293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM SHAWN GIBSON, a.k.a. William Shawn Gipson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
