Cases 11 - 20 of 808,553
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holliday v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephen Holliday
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Vanderpool et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Roxie Vanderpool, Rickie Vanderpool, Allie Vanderpool and others
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Gregory Davis, Peter Derieux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edward Johnson v. Brian Smith, et al
as 24-5436
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, Individually, JOSH STALLONS, Individually and EDWARD EASTMAN, Individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
