Cases 221 - 230 of 829,242
Negron v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
Amado Negron
Defendant:
Craig Washington and Papoosha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gause v. Covington et al
as 5:2024ct03143
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Captain Ronald Covington, Unit Manager Nealey, S Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY, WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MORRIS MOSS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
DEMANZIO LAMONT MORRIS MOSS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak v. Sullivan
as 3:2024cv05428
Plaintiff:
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak
Defendant:
Debbie Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703 Migratory Bird Act
In re: Application for Multi-Court Exemption from the Judicial Conference's Electronic Public Access (EPA) Fees
as 2:2024mc00095
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
(PC) Gallegos v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Leech, S. Boxall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
