Cases 21 - 30 of 51,906
EVANS MICKENS v. CIRCUIT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT et al
as 4:2025cv00102
Plaintiff:
GLORIA EVANS MICKENS, OTIS EVANS and DORIS ENZOR
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FRANK ALLMAN, DAVID FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Foster v. Stateville NRC et al
as 1:2025cv02361
Plaintiff:
Jason Foster
Defendant:
Stateville NRC, Lt. Poter, C/O Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scinto v. United States of America
as 7:2025cv00399
Plaintiff:
Harry Scinto
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
McAlpin v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2025cv00757
Plaintiff:
Tyron McAlpin
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Benjamin Harris, Kyle Sue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2025cv00241
Petitioner:
Harry James Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Riffle
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Harris
Defendant:
Andrew Riffle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuevas v. St. Joseph Hospital et al
as 4:2025cv01025
Plaintiff:
Monique Joyce Cuevas
Defendant:
St. Joseph Hospital, Medical and Harris County Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Harris County Sheriff Department
as 4:2025cv01026
Plaintiff:
Philip Harper
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
