Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 123,599
Smith
as 2:2024mc50579
Smith
as 2:2024mc50580
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff: Eric Smith
Defendant: City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maciol et al
as 6:2024cv00687
Plaintiff: Wayne R. Smith
Defendant: Robert Maciol, Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00893
Defendant: Clara McDonald, Jay Smith, Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff: Gerald K Smith
Defendant: D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff: Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant: Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant: HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Hunter v. King, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff: JAMES HUNTER
Defendant: ALEXIS KING, District Attorney for the 1st Judicial District, in her official capacity, CHRIS SCHAFFER, Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, CHIEF SMITH, Chief of Police for the Lakewood Police Department, in his individual capacity and others
John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: John A. Mansour
Defendant: Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?