Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Thompson v. Officer Roser
as 3:2022cv50049
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department and Officer Roser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ragland
Defendant:
City of Jackson, James Davis, Anthony Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Mark Thompson
as 22-1224
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Anthony Thompson, also known as Spitty
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hernandez-Velasque v. Robeson County, et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Celsa Hernandez-Velasque
Defendant:
Johnson Britt, Ken Sealey, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv01344
Plaintiff:
Sarah Watkins
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Police Officer Andrew Metcalf, Police Officer Bryant Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. People of the State of California
as 5:2021cv08227
Petitioner:
Damarcus Anthony Thompson
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
