Cases 21 - 30 of 1,404
BRANDT et al v. GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRANDT and ANNETTE BRANDT
Defendant:
GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rogers v. Sacramento County, et al.
as 24-559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Board of Supervisors, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, City Clerk, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-512
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Board of Supervisors, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, City Clerk, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10273
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
MICHAEL RUDISILL, NANCY E. BRANDT, GINGER B. BOYD and others
Snyder v. Goble, et al
as 24-4009
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
ALEX GOBLE, Individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court, of Sevier County, Utah, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, STEWART B. HARMAN, American Family Insurance's attorney and others
Roussell v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Roussell, III
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. doing business as Chrysler Capital and Ray Brandt Dodge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Phillips et al v. Zhen et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Lisa Dawn Phillips, Timothy Harold Phillips and Abigail Rose Phillips
Defendant:
Gehua Zhen, Charles Brandt and Edo 's Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cota v. Bacus Foods Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Madeline Cota
Defendant:
Bacus Foods Corporation, Brandt Bacus and Jared Bacus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United Behavioral Health v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-242
Petitioner:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Not Classified By Court:
DAVID WIT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NATASHA WIT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN MUIR, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
