Cases 21 - 30 of 6,003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAMES-BEY v. PARSONS
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
El-Bey v. Armstead et al
as 1:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Laura Armstead, John Addison Howard, Lorelei Saftler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-3393
Plaintiff:
DARIUS JOHNSON BEY, named as Darius-Johnson; Bey
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, in care of Attorney General Kris Mayes, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, Risk Management Division, named as ADOD Risk Management, CITY OF PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, named as The City of Phoenix Police Department and others
Yameen v. CPD et al
as 1:2024cv04487
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Yameen
Defendant:
CPD, JJ Watkins, R. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Damien Bey
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Bey v. E-Insurance
as 2:2024cv03786
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Myree; Bey
Defendant:
E-Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Bey v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01546
Petitioner:
Bernardy Bey
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Boykin v. Liddell El Bey
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Torey Boykin
Defendant:
Tony Liddell El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
