Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Butler v. Cardiff Healthcare et al
as 2:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
Brian Butler
Defendant:
Cardiff Healthcare and Ensign Group, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
McGeough et al v. Prisock et al
as 3:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Francis McGeough and Kimberly Read
Defendant:
Emily Prisock, Lauren Butler, Brian Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asher Hill v. Jerry Snyder, et al
as 15-2607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY SNYDER and BRIAN BUTLER
GRAHAM v. RAWLEY et al
as 2:2015cv00347
Plaintiff:
JESSICA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES T. RAWLEY, NANCY HERRERA, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucero et al v. Weber County Utah et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lucero , Chase Aeschilmann , James Rivas and others
Defendant:
Weber County Utah , Ogden Police Department , Dee Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2013cv00068
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER, BEVERLY GILMORE, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05194
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Butler and Brian Butler
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. FOLINA et al
as 2:2011cv01034
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BUTLER
Defendant:
FOLINA, VALKO and M. LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Butler v. Eaton Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
as 8:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Brian Butler
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
