Cases 21 - 30 of 373
Guan v. O'Grady
as 23-1067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alice Guan
Defendant / Appellee:
Liam O'Grady, as an individual and as Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, Jen Kim, James C. Clark, as an individual and as a Judge and others
Alexander Cameron v. T. Ellis, III
as 23-6645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
T. S. ELLIS, III, District Court Judge, JAMES C. CLARK, Circuit Court Judge, BRYAN PORTER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Bacon et al
as 2:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Kim C Clark and Deonna Hughes
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility, Bacon, V Cordero-Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold et al v. Paredes et al
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Lisa Arnold, Brandi Trout and Sandra Golden-Woods
Defendant:
Miguel Paredes, Prudent Fiduciary Services, LLC, Lawson H. Hardwick, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James Lutz v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6370
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN LUTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD C. CLARKE
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, Jen Kim, James C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, James C. Clark, Jen Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Morse et al
as 5:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wallace
Defendant:
Thomas Rainbow Morse, Craig J. Doran, Vincent M. Dinolfo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
ANGELA C. CLARK
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
