Cases 21 - 30 of 31
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnal v. Cuba, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2015cv01816
Plaintiff:
Adam Carnal
Defendant:
Cuba, Missouri, City of , Ray Mortimeyer , Paul Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Molina-Quintero
as 15-1944
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMON L. MOLINA-QUINTERO, a/k/a Carnal
US v. Molina-Quintero
as 15-1943
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMON L. MOLINA-QUINTERO, a/k/a Carnal
Interested Party:
LETICIA DIAZ-SANTIAGO and YANIRA GRAJALES-DIAZ
Brooks v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2015cv01010
Plaintiff:
Rayquan Carnale Brooks
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Rayquan Carnale Brooks
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinwiddie v. Ossian Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Roy G Dinwiddie
Defendant:
Ossian Police Department, Stephanie Tucker, Wells County Department of Family and Children Services Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Geovanni Hernandez-Carnale
as 13-50212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEOVANNI HERNANDEZ-CARNALES
Delgado v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Alezander Delgado
Defendant:
Gonzalez, K. Allison, D. Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Fria
as 11-330
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Diofemis Santana, AKA Carnal and Wande Nunez, AKA Wichy
Defendant - Appellant:
Danny Frias, AKA Papo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
