Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Hubert Arvie v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 12-31000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUBERT ARVIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, GERALD LEBO, Assistant Warden and others
Universal North America Insurance Company v. Hunter et al
as 2:2012cv02598
Plaintiff:
Universal North America Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles Boyd Hunter, Jr and Charles Boyd Hunter, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Arvie v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv01638
Plaintiff:
Hubert Arvie
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Gerald Lebo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Oceanside Police Department, City of et al
as 3:2012cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
Oceanside Police Department, City of , Oceanside, City of , Vista, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Boyd v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2011cv02071
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Does, Riverside District Attorney's Office and others
Boyd v. City of Oceanside Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv03039
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Oceanside Police Department, Oceanside, City of, San Diego District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Boyd v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2011cv01928
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Riverside County Superior Court, Riverside Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
