Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
Shawnee D. Douglas
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas v. Hininger et al
as 1:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Brandon E. Bowers and Joshep J. Froio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American General Life Insurance Company v. Jordan et al
as 1:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephen D. Douglas, Marcia Jordan and Penn Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Douglas v. Security Life Insurance Company of America
as 7:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
Tracy D Douglas
Defendant:
Security Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TURRENTINE v. LOPEZ et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LEVON TURRENTINE
Defendant:
LOPEZ, K. GREEN, T. D. DOUGLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuel-From-Waste, LLC v. Gold Coast Commodities, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01431
Plaintiff:
Fuel-From-Waste, LLC
Defendant:
Gold Coast Commodities, Inc., Tom W. Douglas, Robert Trey Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Charles Dougla
as 16-4615
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES D. DOUGLAS, a/k/a Chris Davis
McLean v. Smith et al
as 9:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jermaine McLean
Defendant:
Brandon Smith, D. Douglas, K. Ellsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Deyon D. Douglas
Defendant:
Claire Sullivan and Ennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn D. Douglas
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Wells Fargo National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
