Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Ford et al v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 2:2021cv06710
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center, Dr. Grace Ting/MD, Dr. Mathew Reifler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sammy Thomas v. Dr. Lee et al
as 2:2021cv08510
Plaintiff:
Sammy Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Lee and C.M.E. Brite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Chloe Barr
Defendant:
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Dr. Lee McElroy, Dr. Leslie Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eubanks v. Ms. Bishop et al
as 4:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Dr. Lianette Linthicum, Senior Warden Boscoe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Dr. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv03552
Respondent:
Dr. Lee, L. Shover, M. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Albert Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hubbard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Bryan Stirling, Dr. Sadia Rafi and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 1:2021cv01671
Defendant:
The Division of Child Protection & Permanency, JASMINE PETERS, MELISSA MCCAUSLAND and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rondel Delbert Gardner v. CSP - LAC et al
as 2:2020cv07519
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Accounts Consumers Affairs, Cal. Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Rondel Delbert Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZEHRING v. SORBER et al
as 2:2020cv03195
Defendant:
DR. STEPHEN WIENER, TAMMY FERGUSON, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. ZEHRING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Paramo et al
as 3:2020cv00843
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, M. Garikaparthi, E. Benyard and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
