Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Rhoades v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00656
Plaintiff:
David Carl Rhoades
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhoades v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-17794
Plaintiff:
David Carl Rhoades
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Rhoades v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv17794
Plaintiff:
David Carl Rhoades
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps v. Warden Peart
as 8:2014cv00151
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Warden Peart
Petitioner:
David Carl Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Carl Campbell and Susan Campbell
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04766
Plaintiff:
Betty Carling , David Carling , Delina Hill and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMHOFF v. TEMAS et al
as 2:2014cv00044
Defendant:
JOHN TEMAS, STRAWN, MICHAEL KING and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARL IMHOFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-05792
Plaintiff:
Betty Carling , David Carling , Delina Hill and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc , C.R. Bard Inc , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Carling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv05792
Plaintiff:
Betty Carling , David Carling , Delina Hill and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc , C.R. Bard Inc, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
