Cases 21 - 30 of 36
CAMPBELL et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
SIMON CAMPBELL and PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION REFORM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION , MICHAEL FACCINETTO , DAVID HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Metro Transit Police et al
as 0:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Qui Lewis
Defendant:
City of Anoka, MPD Officers, David Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. City of Anoka et al
as 0:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
Tylon Larrice Newcomb
Defendant:
David Hutchinson , Canon Yang , Andrew Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cho et al v. Four M Franchising, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv01613
Defendant:
Four M Franchising, LLC , Four M Capital LLC , Four M Food Service of Atlantic Terminal LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cho , Jennifer Walder , Christina O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chesley et al v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as NH/1:14-cv-00468
Plaintiff:
Chris Chesley , Jason Heroux , David Moosman and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc. , DIRECTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Chesley et al v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Allan Arel, Chris Chesley, Jason Heroux and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc., DIRECTV, LLC and Multiband Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hutchinson v. Ballard
as 3:2014cv14975
Petitioner:
Willard David Hutchinson
Respondent:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
