Cases 21 - 30 of 251
SEBO America, LLC v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
SEBO America, LLC
Defendant:
Chris Jones and Debi Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
(PC) Ramirez v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Israel Ramirez
Defendant:
Perez, Khale, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Martinez v. Ector County, Texas et al
as 7:2022cv00003
Defendant:
Ector County, Texas, Judge Debi Hays and Manuel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Acey et al v. HMS Host USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01395
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Nason, Alexis Jumper, Dana Merklinger and others
Defendant:
Autogrill Group, Inc., HMS Host USA, Inc. and HMS Host Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stoddard, et al. v. Idaho State Penitentiary, et al.
as 1:2021cv00215
Defendant:
Idaho State Penitentiary and The Debi-Cake Program
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Stoddard and Gen. of Gangland (lockdown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
