Cases 21 - 30 of 1,052
Castor et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04825
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH CASTOR, JR., WAYNE DEROUIN, Brian DeVries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gleason v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12143
Plaintiff:
Helen M. Gleason
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Story v. Gravell et al
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Story
Defendant:
Bill Gravell, Mike Gleason, BRIEN CASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. MDOC et al
as 2:2023cv12210
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Thomas, LeShawn Glover, James E. Kitcher and others
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, J. Howard and others
Bonham v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Bonham
Defendant:
Ronald Barnett, Mike Gleason and Ghulam Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ybarra v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2023cv04097
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ybarra
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Ryan Joseph, Andy Orozco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLEASON v. RHINOSYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04376
Defendant:
RHINOSYSTEMS, INC., NAVAGE NASAL CARE and AMAZON, INC.
Plaintiff:
EUGENE GLEASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Crown Equipment Corporation v. Gleason et al
as 2:2023cv12016
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
William Gleason and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gehl v. Gleason
as 0:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Larry Gehl
Defendant:
James P. Gleason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
