Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Hansley v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00267
Plaintiff: David E Hansley, Sr.
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Hansley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv04055
Plaintiff: Alexius M. Hill
Defendant: Officer Hansley, Lieutenant Adams, Sergeant Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansley v. USA
as 1:2016cv00833
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Hansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hansley v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09659
Plaintiff: Bruce Hansley
Defendant: John Does 1-3 and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansley v. Stephens
as 3:2015cv00093
Petitioner: Michael Shayne Hansley
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoppaugh v Hansley, et al
as 5:2015cv00010
Plaintiff: Shelley N Hoppaugh
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co and Luther Hansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Whitaker v. Norfolk Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff: Jeffrey D. Whitaker
Defendant: Norfolk Sheriff's Office, Sheriff McCabe, Lt. Col. Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Hansley
as 13-3022
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL HANSLEY, a/k/a Chris
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner: ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent: W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Green River Coal Company, et al v. Edith Sisk, et al
as 12-3947
Petitioner: GREEN RIVER COAL COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL MIDDLE MARKET, Responsible Operator and Carrier, fka Employers Insurance of Wausau
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EDITH J. SISK, Surviving Spouse of Hansley Sisk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?