Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Andeslay Rodriguez v. Dennis Jones, et al
as 14-12140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDESLAY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY CAMPBELL, in his official capacity as Sheriiff of Leon County Florida, GEORGE STINSON, individually, DEREK TERRY, individually and others
Defendant:
DENNIS JONES, in his offical capacity as the Chief of Police for the Police Department City of Tallahassee Florida
Tyson et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as WVS/2:13-cv-14442
Plaintiff:
Billie Tyson and James Tyson
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Tyson et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv14442
Plaintiff:
Billie Tyson and James Tyson
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2012cv00596
Plaintiff:
ANDESLAY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, DENNIS JONES, GEORGE STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyson v. Persson
as 6:2012cv00154
Respondent:
Rob Persson
Petitioner:
Jesse James Tyson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyson v. USA
as 1:2011cv00622
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HERRING v. USA
as 1:2011cv00781
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES TYSON HERRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tyson et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2010cv03678
Defendant:
County of Suffolk and State of New York
Plaintiff:
Nikkiaya Harper and James Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv60973
Plaintiff:
JAMES TYSON, JR.
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , CSX TRANSPORTATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
USA v. James Tyson, Jr.
as 09-41245
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES TYSON, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
