Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Schroeder, et al. v. University of Oregon
as 26-3762
Petitioner:
ASHLEY SCHROEDER, KENDALL CLARK, HALLI FIELDS and others
Respondent:
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
Stowe v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2026cv02866
Defendant:
Feuerhelm Langer LTD, Susan Ritchie-Mohler, Candice Kastel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Stowe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YMCA of Greater Boston, Inc. v. Bakri
as 1:2026cv12399
Plaintiff:
YMCA of Greater Boston, Inc.
Defendant:
Hyh'nes Hidiyah Bakri
Counter-Claimant:
Hyh'nes Hidiyah Bakri
Counter-Defendant:
YMCA of Greater Boston, Inc. and Jade Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Collins v. Tomasi et al
as 5:2026cv03139
Petitioner:
Justin Jade Collins
Respondent:
Billy Tomasi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01211
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, . Regina, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Farley et al
as 1:2026cv01209
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
. Farley, . Propp, . Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Holloway v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv03094
Plaintiff:
Jade Holloway
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.