Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Frazier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01388
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Frazier , Renee Anderson , Darlene Arden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILES v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2015cv01032
Plaintiff:
RAJAHN MILES
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICER BOB DOE, OFFICER RON ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moe v. NNCC et al
as 3:2014cv00689
Defendant:
I. Baca, Rocky Baros, Eugene Murguia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Moe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moe v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv00410
Petitioner:
Michael John Moe
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FONTROY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, RICHARD ELLIS, REX BETNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Prall v. Cococcia
as 13-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Cococcia, Mary E. Ahern, Judith E. Wildfeuer and others
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Robert Moes v. John Woodward, et al
as 12-2547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN MOES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WOODWARD and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Community Development Code Compliance Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
