Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Flournoy v. Sproul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff: Michael Flournoy
Defendant: Warden Sproul, C. Davis, Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00917
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mikeyla Mitchell v. Unknown
as 21-7372
Petitioner / Appellant: MIKEYLA K. MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee: UNKNOWN
Mikeyla Mitchell v. GEICO Corporate Office
as 21-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant: MIKEYLA K. MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee: GEICO CORPORATE OFFICE and IMPACT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Mitchell v. USA
as 5:2021cv06104
Petitioner: Nathaniel K Mitchell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55725
Plaintiff: FABIAN K MITCHELL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. GEICO Corporate Office et al
as 2:2021cv00434
Plaintiff: Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Defendant: GEICO Corporate Office and Impact Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00729
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00302
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?