Cases 21 - 30 of 45
First Home Bank v. Bowen Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2017cv06729
Plaintiff:
First Home Bank
Defendant:
Bowen Enterprises LLC, Kevin Lawrence Bowen and Bowen Enterprises II LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robles v. United States Attorney et al
as 3:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Rolando Robles
Defendant:
United States Attorney, Attorney General, Dannel Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2016cv03011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Randolph
Defendant:
Kevin Lawrence and Leon Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mumford v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00450
Respondent:
United States of America
Movant:
Kevin Lawrence Mumford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lawrence v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01502
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lawrence
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kentucky Coal Association, et al v. TVA
as 15-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTUCKY COAL ASSOCIATION, JAMES ROGERS, III, J.L. ROGERS FAMILY LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Lawrence v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lawrence
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Lilly Management and Marketing, LLC
as 3:2014cv02399
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Lilly Management and Marketing, LLC and Kevin Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Kentucky Coal Association, Inc. et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 4:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kentucky Coal Association, Inc. , James Rogers, III , J.L. Rogers Family LLC and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
