Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Phillip v. Dozier et al
as 2:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Charles Phillip
Defendant:
Steve Dozier , Kyle Anderson, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. GC Publishers LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anderson
Defendant:
Cesar Camacho, Yamilet Camacho and GC Publishers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Anderson v. GC Publishers LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anderson
Defendant:
GC Publishers LLC , Cesar Camacho and Yamilet Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ANDERSON v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In The Matter of the Complaint of Associated Marine Services, Inc
as 1:2007cv00198
Claimant:
Kyle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
